Graffiti Cans

To understand why graffiti is so reviled by the powers as mere "vandalism", he must know what vandalism is. Painter Gustave Courbet (vandal famous himself) felt that it was the "destruction of monuments symbolizing war and conquest, to be romantic I might find it difficult to accept, since when a group of chavs never openly justify the fire, for example a bus shelter in terms of socio-economic importance of the shelter? I have yet to agree. A handle more likely that vandalism is an expression of an alternative crop, namely the "criminal".

Vandalism is enforced against the property of others, in any case, and in my opinion, the root reason why it is considered unacceptable in a capitalist society like ours: it destroys the link operates between being a well adjusted, functional person at work, and his material wealth. Tags on cars to make them worthless, and therefore the number of hours spent at work counting the money required to buy car said are more valuable to the worker. The tag has transubstantiated work at a point where it can be used to buy things, where it is totally unnecessary. Needless to say, for the worker, it was overwhelming. His car is ruined, and he lost time to make reports on how John Doe broke both legs while sodomizing a large black man onto a non-payment for a claim of insurance. The worker therefore the link vandalism cancels his exploits, and should therefore be contrary to its objectives, a bit like an enemy.

For me it's a good thing, it reminds us of the transitory nature of material things, and it seems that many teams that do not produce shit Graff intend to remind us that there are more important things the emergence of a public space, or the appearance of a car. It is a special case because the car still be useful as a tool, and nothing else. It becomes a status symbol for hours sacrificed or compromised ideals to achieve a status of the worker had to make the purchase possible. Some people need that encourages violence more than others, but I see graffiti as a vehicle towards a more functional and less significant ruling system of thought. This can be regarded as "criminal culture" mentioned above. It can also learn that events do not necessarily follow each other, and infuse a little interest in the life of your average 40-year-old is perfectly fine and all, but wandering its way to the tomb after left all his passions in his 20's. This interest, "" is something the taggers sometimes find when they enter the risk-taking tagging a train, or someone's personal property, indulging an impulse made redundant years ago, when the risk has been led to survival, for example, by capturing animals to eat, etc., so I am obliged to support graffiti in this spirit of awakening the senses, through the desecration of some things that we are expensive: for the love of one who had his house graffiti'd (it's for his own good) and for youth burning desire not to become completely numb, a company whose recent actions seem to address sovereign people as insane economic units.

It is also important to celebrate graffiti expressing unfavorable, and even seditious views, because they are socially extremely important. They remind us that "the 'right to freedom of expression extends no further than what the government wants to tell us, and no farther. Examples such as Richard Barnbrook treatment at the London Assembly, and laws prohibiting the occupation of hatred for homosexuals and minorities reflect this bastardized version of freedom of expression, prohibiting the discussion of "extreme" and 'underground' views. Look at the picture below. To "say" such a thing.